Unimodal Domains, Anti-exchange Properties, and Coalitional Strategy-proofness of Voting Rules
نویسنده
چکیده
It is shown that simple and coalitional strategy-proofness of a voting rule on the full unimodal domain of a convex idempotent interval space (X, I) are equivalent properties if (X, I) satisfies interval anti-exchange, a basic property also shared by a large class of convex geometries including -but not reducing totrees and linear geometries. Therefore, strategy-proof location problems in a vast class of networks fall under the scope of that proposition. It is also established that a much weaker minimal anti-exchange property is necessary to ensure equivalence of simple and coalitional strategy-proofness in that setting. An immediate corollary to that result is that such ‘unimodal’equivalence fails to hold both in certan median interval spaces including those induced by bounded distributive lattices that are not chains, and in certain non-median interval spaces including those induced by non-trivial Hamming graphs. Thus, anti-exchange properties of the relevant interval space provide a powerful general common principle that explains the varying relationship between simple and coalitional strategy-proofness of voting rules for full unimodal domains across different interval spaces, both median and non-median. MSC 2010 Classification: 05C05, 52021, 52037 JEL Classification number : D71
منابع مشابه
Coalitional Strategy-Proofness in Economies with Single-Dipped Preferences and the Assignment of an Indivisible Object
We study two allocation models. In the first model, we consider the problem of allocating an infinitely divisible commodity among agents with single-dipped preferences. In the second model, a degenerate case of the first one, we study the allocation of an indivisible object to a group of agents. Our main result is the characterization of the class of Pareto optimal and coalitionally strategy-pr...
متن کاملDecomposing Random Mechanisms
Random mechanisms have been used in real-life situations for reasons such as fairness. Voting and matching are two examples of such situations. We investigate whether desirable properties of a random mechanism survive decomposition of the mechanism as a lottery over deterministic mechanisms that also hold such properties. To this end, we represent properties of mechanisms—such as ordinal strate...
متن کاملStrategy-proofness versus efficiency in exchange economies: General domain properties and applications
We identify general domain properties that induce the non-existence of efficient, strategy-proof, and non-dictatorial rules in the 2-agent exchange economy. Applying these properties, we establish the impossibility result in several restricted domains; the “intertemporal exchange problem” (without saving technology) with preferences represented by the discounted sum of a temporal utility functi...
متن کاملCharacterizations of Pareto-efficient, fair, and strategy-proof allocation rules in queueing problems
A set of agents with different waiting costs have to receive a service of equal length of time from a single provider which can serve only one agent at a time. One needs to form a queue and set up monetary transfers to compensate the agents who have to wait. We analyze rules that are efficient, fair, and immune to strategic behavior. We prove that no rule is Pareto-efficient and coalitional str...
متن کاملDetecting Possible Manipulators in Elections
Manipulation is a problem of fundamental importance in the context of voting in which the voters exercise their votes strategically instead of voting honestly to prevent selection of an alternative that is less preferred. The GibbardSatterthwaite theorem shows that there is no strategy-proof voting rule that simultaneously satisfies certain combinations of desirable properties. Researchers have...
متن کامل